Reviewing scientific papers.

نویسنده

  • S McKenzie
چکیده

Guidelines for the preparation of structured reports for laboratory studies, clinical studies, epidemiological studies, and observations could be useful. A structured report should prompt reviewers to acknowledge familiarity or otherwise with method, background papers, and so on. New reviewers could draw up their own system. Reports should be helpful and courteous so that whether or not the paper is accepted for publication the authors have a chance to improve it.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Application of a Heuristic Cybernetic Model in Peer-reviewing Process of Scholarly Papers

Background and Aim: This study attempts to show the cybernetics approach on peer reviewing articles to recommend an appropriate solution for increasing the qualitative level of published articles in scientific journals. Method: Heuristic Cybernetics method is suggested, based on the scientific experiences of related researches and also the mathematical principles that is an appropriate formed s...

متن کامل

Reading a Scientific Article

In this Webinar, we will go over the fundamentals of scientific papers, including the different types of scientific literature available and the structural elements of a scientific article. Also, we will cover the importance of scientific papers, why do we read them, and how do we decide which papers to read. Finally, we will discuss some of the guidelines for reading a scientific paper and cri...

متن کامل

What Constitutes Peer Review of Data: A survey of published peer review guidelines

Since a number of journals specifically focus on the review and publication of data sets, reviewing their policies seems an appropriate place to start in assessing what existing practice looks like in the 'real world' of reviewing and publishing data. This article outlines a study of the publicly available peer review policies of 39 scientific publications that publish data papers to discern wh...

متن کامل

Acarp: Author-Centric Analysis of Research Papers

Scientific publications are an important kind of user-generated content, which contains not only high-quality content but also structures, e.g. citations. Scientific publication analysis has attracted much attention in both database and data mining research community. In this demonstration, we present a system, named as Acarp, for analyzing research papers in database community. The relationshi...

متن کامل

Guest Editors Scientific Editor Editor-in-chief Pseudo-canonical Formulae Are Classical Tarski Geometry Axioms Guest Editors Scientific Editor Editor-in-chief

All papers are checked by the Mizar system, automatically translated into English and automatically typset in L A T E X. Formalized Mathematics is issued quarterly and publishes Mizar articles contributed to the Mizar Mathematical Library (MML). Preparation of the papers. All articles should be written in Mizar language and checked by the Mizar system, followed by a bibliography file which summ...

متن کامل

How to Write a Reviewer Report

The peer review process helps editors to decide what to publish, and it ensures the quality and credibility of the papers as well as of the journal itself. The reviewer must identify any fault in the paper and provide constructive feedback to the authors so that they can improve their work before publication. Other researchers in the field provide this service to you when they review papers you...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Archives of disease in childhood

دوره 72 6  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1995